|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Uronksur Suth
Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.07.05 07:12:00 -
[1]
Originally by: RedSplat No.
Highsec isnt risk free, it isnt intended to be. Your proposal is motivated by a desire to see Highsec become safer, riskless gameplay strikes at the heart of what makes EVE unique.
No.
You want to nerf an entire profession without providing ample recompense or alternatives to gankers.
Further, Suicide Ganking is the only way to engage in pvp with people in NPC corps abusing the fact they cant be wardec'd. Remove insurance payouts and NPC corps will be totally unassailable by nature of suicide ganking being economically impossible to support.
No.
You already have the tools as a player to defend yourselves and more, strike back at gankers; stop whining, start doing something about it in game.
You may gather i dont support removing insurance from CONCORD shiploss.
Supported. And the above post doesn't bother addressing why criminals would receive insurance payouts for their destroyed ships, and for "Suicide ganking"
Since when should blowing up your own vessel, or going kamikaze, or self-destructing yield insurance payouts? The same principle applies to this issue. 
|

Uronksur Suth
Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.07.05 07:29:00 -
[2]
Originally by: NereSky Both self destruct and Ship loss through Concorde should invalidate the insurance on the ship -- i totally agree, what insurance company in their right mind would insure ships lost in these circs?
*admits to having done it so he wouldn't have to move his Mining Barge through 0.0*
No one would, but every time its proposed, and I've seen it proposed several times, the pirate community, especially those who go suicide ganking, go absolutely ballistic
|

Uronksur Suth
Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.07.05 22:06:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: De'Veldrin
Originally by: Malcanis
Oddly enough, pod pilots aren't considered citizens.
I'd be curious to know why you think this. I wasn't aware that we handed in our citizenship when we left orbit.
In what meaningful way are pod pilots citizens?
We pay taxes. We join militias. We run missions for empire corporations. 
|

Uronksur Suth
Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.07.09 06:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Velvet Sinner There needs to be an internal mechanic that links different alts to the same human being (ie, payment device). Your toon isn't deciding to gank a Hulk; it's the warped brain of the human behind the keyboard. You gank in hi-sec, all accounts associated with the ganking toon are banned immediately. The only way around it would be those that pay for their account(s) with isk; even GTC buyers can be tracked thru payment mechanism. Also make trial accounts unable to fire on non-NPC ships in high-sec.
Are you joking, or are you really that insane? 
Like, I support the proposed alteration to insurance, but your taking it way too far.
|

Uronksur Suth
Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 17:39:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Xiao LoPan
Originally by: Space Pinata Edited by: Space Pinata on 18/07/2009 00:32:21
if CONCORD says you're a criminal, the insurance company doesn't necessarily agree.
no insurance provider in any realm of reality or unreality will ever disagree with being told not to pay.
true, that.
|
|
|
|